FDA Advisory Panel Votes No on Approving Cangrelor in PCI

February 12, 2014

SILVER SPRINGTIME, MD-- A Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) advising panel voted 7 to 2 that cangrelor (the Medicines Company, Parsippany, NJ), an intravenously administered antiplatelet representative, need to not be approved for the decrease of thrombotic cardio events in patients with coronary artery illness going through PCI.

Acting chairperson Dr Philip Sager (Stanford University Institution of Medicine, CA) and Dr Jennifer Li (Duke University Institution of Medicine, Durham, NC) voted of course, however most the panel had trouble with the information, with the experts suggesting that the risk/benefit profile was not sufficiently solid good enough to recommend approval. Particularly, a few of the panel participants were troubled by the totality of the proof, keeping in mind that 2 clinical trials with cangrelor were adverse, and regardless of the positive results with CHAMPION-PHOENIX , these previous research studies mattered and factored into their "no" vote.

Furthermore, the advising panel suggested denying the application for a cangrelor bridging sign. Particularly, the 9 panel participants voted versus approving cangrelor for usage in patients with stents at increased threat for thrombotic events which need to quit dental P2Y12 obstacle since they are going through surgical procedure. There were absolutely no votes in favor of approving cangrelor as a "bridge" Treatment, generally since the panel participants again really felt there had not been sufficient proof to supply an evaluation of the dangers and advantages.

The major trials examining cangrelor, all of which were mentioned by heart cord , consist of CHAMPION-PCI and CHAMPION-PLATFORM , both of which examined the new IV Drug in ACS patients set up for PCI. Both were quit early in 2009 after acting evaluations recommended neither study would reveal an advantage. The CHAMPION-PHOENIX study was sponsored by the Medicines Company to take care of issues raised concerning those earlier trials-- namely, that they were adverse due to troubles adjudicating new MIs in patients with high biomarkers at standard.

PHOENIX was an 11 000-patient trial testing cangrelor in patients going through PCI for secure angina or for severe coronary disorders (ACS), consisting of STEMI. On the whole, treatment with cangrelor lessened the composite effectiveness end factor of all-cause mortality, MI, ischemia-driven coronary revascularization, and stent apoplexy by 22 % reviewed with patients addressed a 300-mg or 600-mg packing dosage of clopidogrel. The threat of stent apoplexy was lessened 38 % and the threat of MI lessened 20 %.


Earlier today, the FDA uploaded an evaluation of the cangrelor information by its very own interior evaluators. One customer was exceptionally important of the information and argued that the "CHAMP trials do disappoint supremacy or noninferiority of a cangrelor routine to clopidogrel or to standard of treatment." 2 various other evaluators, nonetheless, thought the overall risk/benefit profile, which analyzed the threat of bleeding vs the advantage of reducing thrombotic events, showed mixed results. They inevitably ended, nonetheless, there was a "limited" advantage in the PCI establishing that was driven by a reduction in periprocedural MIs.

heart cord will certainly update this story tomorrow.

Leave your comment